From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 06:34:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F61106566B for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 06:34:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from xiurhn.etoilebsd.net (xiurhn.etoilebsd.net [94.23.37.58]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA618FC08 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 06:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by xiurhn.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 6E4A27E819; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 08:34:24 +0200 (CEST) To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 06:34:24 +0000 From: Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <564d9e22b5c244e22931dde918d7ef0e@etoilebsd.net> References: <86hb5yaav0.fsf@gmail.com> <4E3D73B9.7090406@FreeBSD.org> <564d9e22b5c244e22931dde918d7ef0e@etoilebsd.net> Message-ID: <9b9a9fff764daddc1e3a17ed18a23884@etoilebsd.net> X-Sender: bapt@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.3 Subject: Re: bsdtar(1) can't extract new ISO images X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 06:34:25 -0000 On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 20:37:38 +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sat, 06 Aug 2011 19:02:49 +0200, Martin Matuska wrote: >> The error is in FreeBSD ISO images. >> They are created using makefs and that doesn't create ISO files that >> strictly comple to the ECMA-119 (ISO9660 standard). >> >> I have already filed a PR at NetBSD (bin/45217): >> http://gnats.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=45217 >> >> The volume_set_id doesn't have to be filled with 0x20 characters, >> too. >> I am also preparing a patch for libarchive (different things), but >> that >> won't fix that one bug - makefs needs to be fixed. >> > > Maybe you can also directly contact NetBSD developpers who have > interest in makefs. > After I proposed the patch to sync makefs with netbsd version, avg@ > found a bug, I pinged christos@netbsd,org about this and he was > really > reactive. > It seems that "responsive" is better adapted in English that "reactive" less ambiguity. regards, Bapt