From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Thu Jul 19 07:25:45 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58230104E09B; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxim.konovalov@gmail.com) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0E1D81CA2; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxim.konovalov@gmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6J7C0ca040834; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:12:01 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from maxim.konovalov@gmail.com) Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:12:00 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Randall Stewart cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r336465 - in head/sys/netinet: . tcp_stacks In-Reply-To: <201807182249.w6IMns6D076446@repo.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201807182249.w6IMns6D076446@repo.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 07:25:45 -0000 Hi Randall, On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 22:49-0000, Randall Stewart wrote: > Author: rrs > Date: Wed Jul 18 22:49:53 2018 > New Revision: 336465 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/336465 > > Log: > Bump the ICMP echo limits to match the RFC > [...] Just wonder, are there any practical reasons to do that? While I don't see any meaningful vectors right now this could potentially make amplification DoS easier, no? -- Maxim Konovalov