From owner-freebsd-current Fri Sep 7 14:39:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.dis.org (mass.dis.org [216.240.45.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D4937B405 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.dis.org (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f87Ljko15766; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:45:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org) Message-Id: <200109072145.f87Ljko15766@mass.dis.org> To: FreeBSD Fanatic Cc: current@Freebsd.org, Bakul@KIWI-Computer.com, Shah , msmith@mass.dis.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: ACPI CHANGES AFFECTING MOST -CURRENT USERS In-Reply-To: Message from FreeBSD Fanatic of "Fri, 07 Sep 2001 10:40:24 CDT." <200109071540.f87FeO077964@KIWI-Computer.com> Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 14:45:46 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I suppose I could volunteer for this. I've been dissecting the loader for > months now and hitting the 4th "fence" has been bothersome.. As far as > braving those pesky naysayers, I thought about doing it on my own anyway so > if no one wants the change, I'll just keep it for my own systems. =) > > If nothing else, I'm very curious to see how small I can get a Scheme > implementation.. I'd at least be curious to see how small the alternatives are. I'm not enormously keen to migrate since the .4th support code we have is fairly comprehensive, but it would be foolish to ignore the options. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message