From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 3 10:49:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC2716A400; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:49:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arved@freebsd.org) Received: from omega.inso.tuwien.ac.at (omega.inso.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.59.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEAB43D4C; Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:49:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arved@freebsd.org) Received: from hush68.swe (fwswe.rise-s.com [83.65.168.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by omega.inso.tuwien.ac.at (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id k33AvDd1012947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EXP1024-RC4-SHA bits=56 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:57:14 +0200 From: Tilman Linneweh To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, troy@twisted.net, sylvioc@gmail.com, arved@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2006 12:48:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060401024216.GA33171@twisted.net> In-Reply-To: <20060401024216.GA33171@twisted.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604031248.34804.arved@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Cc: sin@bitchx.org, ggajic@afrodita.rcub.bg.ac.yu Subject: Re: BitchX for AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 10:49:11 -0000 hi, On Saturday 01 April 2006 04:42, Troy wrote: > Are there any plans to port BitchX to AMD64. Currently the ports tree > only supports x86. A few months ago, Goran Gajic (CCed) submitted a large patch to make Bx work on amd64 http://www.rcub.bg.ac.yu/~ggajic/pub/amd64-patches/bitchx-amd64-patch.gz Unfortunately AFAIK the current port maintainer (CCed) has not responded yet. The patch needs to be modified to go into the ports tree (The patches against the Makefiles need to be against Makefile.in, the patch against config.h appears to be superflous etc.) regards arved