From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 28 01:31:32 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AF2BD16A4CE; Fri, 28 May 2004 01:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 95A8043D49; Fri, 28 May 2004 01:31:32 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <20040528083112015006prepe>; Fri, 28 May 2004 08:31:13 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA77272;
	Fri, 28 May 2004 01:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 01:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.60.0405281022360.18426@zeus>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0405280128570.63204-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: shutdown node VS disconnect all hooks
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 08:31:32 -0000



On Fri, 28 May 2004, Harti Brandt wrote:

> On Fri, 28 May 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> JE>> If you do that, I suppose you need to edit all the nodes, right?. In that
> JE>> case could you please convert the initialisation of the typestructs
> JE>> to use C99 sparse initialisation? In that case future changes will be a good
> JE>> deal easier.
> JE>
> JE>actually I don't know if you do need to edit the nodes
> JE>types.. At one time it was true that unassigned elements on
> JE>the end will be NULL.
> 
> Sure they will, but this will confuse the next one who is adding
> a new operation. I was just thinking: 'In the case that Gleb has nothing 
> else to do he could as well just take the chance...' :-)

He seems to have taken the bait
(heh heh)

It'd be best to make the change to sparse initialisers a separate patch
that I cold commit separatly,
so reduce teh size of the functionality change patch.

(or harti could commit it.., or ruslan)

> 
> harti
>