From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 16 20:53:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA04626
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 20:53:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.75])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA04599
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 20:52:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unalmodem.usc.unal.edu.co (unalmodem08.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.38])
	by apolo.biblos.unal.edu.co (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA12897;
	Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:51:14 -0500 (COT)
Message-ID: <3355B7BE.19C7@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 22:40:14 -0700
From: Pedro Giffuni <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (Win16; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Giles Lean <giles@nemeton.com.au>
CC: David Nugent <davidn@unique.usn.blaze.net.au>,
        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>,
        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: on the subject of changes to -RELEASEs...
References: <199704162134.HAA01597@nemeton.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Giles Lean wrote:
>
> Pedro,
> 
> Many more people call procmail from .forward than have it as their
> local mail delivery program so it must be accessible to smrsh.
>
As I said, I can be wrong, and if procmail is used in the .forward I
definitely AM wrong.
 
> David's suggestion that the procmail port install to co-operate with
> smrsh is a good one, following the principle of least astonishment.
>
No problem with me, then.

Pedro.
 
> Giles