From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 20 19:00:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C72106566C for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from aegis.hamla.org (aegis.hamla.org [206.251.255.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6348FC12 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aegis.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9D25C30; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:00:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at aegis.hamla.org Received: from aegis.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aegis.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Tbd+Zhcd8xdf; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:00:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:00:38 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: Jean-Pierre Bergamin Message-ID: <20080720190038.GC13724@shepherd> References: <1216576403.10706.7.camel@toshi.weizenstrasse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1216576403.10706.7.camel@toshi.weizenstrasse> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, barner@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: boost 1.36 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "sahil@tandon.net" List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:00:43 -0000 Jean-Pierre Bergamin wrote: > Dear FreeBSD folks > > Boost 1.36.0 will soon be released. Are there any plans to make a port > of this new release? The one for version 1.35 was already missing. > > If I can help you in preparing the port in any way, please let me know. You can help by creating, testing, and submitting a PR that upgrades the existing boost port to 1.36. Read: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/ Though, to avoid duplicating efforts, it might be worth waiting a few days for Simon's response in case he is already working on 1.36. Based on mailing list archives, he was testing 1.35 back in April of this year. -- Sahil Tandon