From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 20 12:25:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1F993A; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024D08FC0A; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:25:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBDC53.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.220.83]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q9KCOpSq093709; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:24:52 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q9KCOe8I085369; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:24:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9KCOSvN097641; Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:24:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201210201224.q9KCOSvN097641@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= Subject: Re: RFC: removal of share/doc/{papers,psd,smm,usd} in 2 months From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:52:17 +0200." <20121020115217.GI69724@acme.spoerlein.net> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:24:28 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Eitan Adler , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:25:04 -0000 Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= wrote: > On Fri, 2012-10-19 at 12:14:28 -0400, Eitan Adler wrote: > > On 19 October 2012 10:36, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: > > > Should people feel strongly about them, we might be able to move them > > > over to the doc repository. > > > > Moving them to the doc repo loses the history, for what gain? > > > > You mention that the roff sources are 'naughty'. Are they holding up > > some project? > > Replying to this only here: If you have a look at your calendar, you > might get the reference :) > > They are holding up the removal of groff from the base system, which we > can no longer update thanks to the project policy wrt. GPLv3. It's awful damage from just not wanting to upgrade to a new groff with GPL3, to also throwing out older working groff plus text sources formatted by it. I use groff daily. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text. Not: HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable.