From owner-freebsd-commit  Mon Nov 20 16:33:27 1995
Return-Path: owner-commit
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA29306
          for freebsd-commit-outgoing; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:33:27 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA29286
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:33:25 -0800
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA29269
          for cvs-usrsbin-outgoing; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:33:21 -0800
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA29225
          ; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:33:08 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA10049; Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:32:47 -0800
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@westhill.cdrom.com>
cc: Peter Wemm <peter@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        CVS-commiters@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrsbin@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src collect.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Nov 1995 15:36:55 PST."
             <1282.816910615@westhill.cdrom.com> 
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 1995 16:32:46 -0800
Message-ID: <10047.816913966@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-commit@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

I think it's time to review commit policy in -stable now that the
release is out.

I certainly wouldn't mind a more relaxed approach to letting any of
the commiters bring the really obvious fixes over.  This would include
docs, etc..

I would consider 2.1-stable now a branch for putting all the fixes we
would have really loved to have seen go into 2.1 but must now live
with being in 2.1.1.

						Jordan


> Peter Wemm wrote in message ID
> <199511202332.PAA23784@freefall.freebsd.org>:
> > peter       95/11/20 15:32:26
> 
> >   Modified:    usr.sbin/sendmail/src  collect.c
> >   Log:
> >   If sendmail is collecting a message *not* via SMTP, then this patch will
> >   turn off the read data block timeouts.  This was inspired by the same fix
> >   in sendmail-8.7, but the code in this area is somewhat different. (8.7
> >   is much more sensible).  This will stop the infamous
> >   "timeout waiting for input during message body read" on long running jobs
,
> >   eg: /etc/daily | mail root.
> 
> Any chance of this going into the 2.1 branch?
> 
> Gary