From owner-freebsd-ia64 Fri Jan 10 15: 2:36 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E2337B401 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE0243F43 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:02:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0AN2X2G024220; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:02:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0AN2XBR001343; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:02:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0AN2XqI001342; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:02:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 15:02:33 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Thomas Moestl Cc: Scott Long , re-builders@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Something's wrong with ports/devel... Message-ID: <20030110230233.GA1296@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20030110214547.GA1100@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <3E1F43AF.40002@btc.adaptec.com> <20030110222829.GA1196@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20030110224115.GE1732@crow.dom2ip.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030110224115.GE1732@crow.dom2ip.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 11:41:15PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > > > It never get's past the "Applying :S ..." :-( > > > > There's no update for the makefile. Is this a genuine make(1) bug? > > See the attached patch. S///g does hang (unsurprisingly). This is a work-around, right? Put differently: is it the intention of the makefile writer to replace the value of ${_CPUCFLAGS} with the empty string or is it the intention to replace the literal "${_CPUCFLAGS} with the empty string? In any case, we need to guard against substituting the empty string for something else... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message