From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 20 17:34:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53CD16A417 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:34:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from athome@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (12-32-44-142.static.blackfoot.net [12.32.44.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834A313C46B for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:34:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from athome@dreamchaser.org) Received: from [12.32.36.74] (freshstart.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.74]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lBKH5uJG009597 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:05:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from athome@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <476A9FD0.4060607@dreamchaser.org> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:01:04 -0700 From: At Home User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:05:56 -0700 (MST) Subject: 6.2 and Asus A7N8X-E X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 17:34:15 -0000 I've got an extra Asus A7N8X-E mobo I'm trying to bring 6.2 up on. AMD 3200+, Barton 2G PC-3200 rom, 1G OCZ and 1G Kingston valueram Seagate ES ST3250820NS Sata drives jumpered for 1.5GB only NVidia FX5600 AGP display adapter I checked the archives and found comments about disabling ACPI, which I've done, but it still hangs at various points in the process of loading up the disk. I've tried turning off the on-board SATA controller and using an Adaptec SATA controller with no improvement. I've also tried slowing the clock and a few other de-optimizations, to no avail. Is this basically a bad idea, or is there some piece of the puzzle I'm missing? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, Gary