Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 22:57:11 +0200 From: Marcin Cieslak <saper@system.pl> To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is the patch-gtkfix still needed with 2.4? Message-ID: <48012227.60509@system.pl> In-Reply-To: <1208022510.26067.17.camel@fbsd1.dyndns.org> References: <1208022510.26067.17.camel@fbsd1.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7A31E517EBD558CBA61E932A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Scott T. Hildreth wrote: > I am still running 2.3 and am considering the upgrade to 2.4. =20 > I think a lot of the patches that have been reported on the=20 > list have been committed (I think). I don't think the patch-gtkfix=20 > was committed or was even going to be committed or still needed with > 2.4. Check if you have files/patch-i75190 in your port. --Marcin --------------enig7A31E517EBD558CBA61E932A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAwUBSAEiKj2W2v2wY27ZAQOU7AP/SnwK1QwWyPKycQDyHpUqnw2GsqYSR+Dc ud0yScY32s1cZY7bluIyvEkLtCnBERHTv0eCFi8XTM6ybYAsqlcsG4zXncDROvEA UXRulUIOTop0iPeEUIvLMVy/8hAi1GSSsh7AEJvAR/+bOeruZEarW9HD5S21B9Cp LNV0kmMjnlY= =PDwd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7A31E517EBD558CBA61E932A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48012227.60509>