From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 13:10:06 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5221065670
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:10:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8E18FC19
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:10:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LMj1x-0003TI-C3
	for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:10:05 +0000
Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:10:05 +0000
Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:10:05 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:09:46 +0100
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <gki3r5$q3u$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20090113122111.GA89189@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enigF456D84D5B3D03809C7CE80C"
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
In-Reply-To: <20090113122111.GA89189@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: geom 'taste' vs. manual creation ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:10:06 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigF456D84D5B3D03809C7CE80C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> geom(4) says:
>=20
>    A geom which came into being as a result of a normal taste operation=

>    should self-destruct...
>=20
> Now I wonder:
> does the GEOM infrastructure record whether a geom has been created
> by a 'taste' call, or manually through a 'geom xxx create ..', or
> this info should be managed directly by the individual implementation ?=


I'm not sure if this is what you're asking, but when a new geom is
created (for example by a complex / transformation GEOM class...), it is
automatically tested again, so why would it be different now?


--------------enigF456D84D5B3D03809C7CE80C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJbJKaldnAQVacBcgRAnGoAKDbJ8bHI27Om+0z8JQaA2T8bezyCwCggTzq
mTSHkrhY1QBTW3O05E7324w=
=Dfrm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigF456D84D5B3D03809C7CE80C--