From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 18:38:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70F916A418 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A745513C491 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9HIc1HO000573; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:38:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l9HIc12H000572; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:38:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:38:01 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Simon Barner Message-ID: <20071017183801.GA420@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: obrien@freebsd.org, Simon Barner , freebsd-current References: <471543CA.70409@protected-networks.net> <47154750.1080109@FreeBSD.org> <20071017143652.GA2751@dose.local.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071017143652.GA2751@dose.local.invalid> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: another gcc 4.2 breakage? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:38:01 -0000 On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:36:52PM +0200, Simon Barner wrote: > I have a compile fix for this problem -- the resulting binary dumps > core though. I can commit the fix and mark the port IGNORE on RELENG_7 > until we have a proper solution. Why be that drastic? Just require GCC=3.4 -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? Let's not play "Jeopardy-style quoting"