From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 00:43:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB07106564A for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 00:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gpalmer@freebsd.org) Received: from noop.in-addr.com (mail.in-addr.com [IPv6:2001:470:8:162::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DDE8FC1D for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 00:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gjp by noop.in-addr.com with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1SacQI-0004MG-Mi; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:42:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 20:42:30 -0400 From: Gary Palmer To: Dave Hayes Message-ID: <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> References: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: gpalmer@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on noop.in-addr.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 00:43:12 -0000 On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 05:12:14PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: > Mehmet Erol Sanliturk writes: > > If you are NOT using FreeBSD for any area or some areas , would you please > > list those areas with most important first to least important last ? > > 1) I don't use FreeBSD for virtualization as the host OS. I really want > to, becaus I want to be able to somewhat trust the kernel hosting my > virtual machines. FreeBSD technology, support, and documentation for > this idea appears unavailable. Have you looked at VirtualBox? /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose Its not a fully featured replacement for vSphere (e.g. no equivalent of vMotion) but it is a perfectly workable virtualisation solution for a number of situations. Gary