From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 10 13:12:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8644A16A420 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:12:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA8243D49 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:12:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dpkirchner@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so502441wxc for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 05:12:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gKavl76Xz8tSeVzm/EnYW+78zJHAIegmbHQ7Mpos2qP5WmrxfoBZAK/Nye6bU4eAhBJlvDXywSUedlQ2LapM8fcoOr3cDQ/SZRO/KAIw+QM5Qc/f2nJ2358FlMh1qI5SWn3LMvPiDLUUwucNM+mcPtzUHEjESHJ4PR6a7YZOwo8= Received: by 10.70.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr1037092wxa; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 12:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.104.18 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:04:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <35c231bf0511091204t60817b15v6934e41323f4060a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 12:04:33 -0800 From: David Kirchner Sender: dpkirchner@gmail.com To: Barkley Vowk In-Reply-To: <20051109113648.D3622@3jane.math.ualberta.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20051109113648.D3622@3jane.math.ualberta.ca> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystems >1TB not possible on 6.0-R (anymore?). X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 13:12:07 -0000 On 11/9/05, Barkley Vowk wrote: > I've got a 3TB (7 x 500GB w/ hot-spare) array on an areca board in amd64. > > Under 5.4-R I could have >1TB filesystems without an issue. I recall not > having problems with 6.0-BETA5 too. > > However, 6.0-R gives me a tragic: > > /dev/da0s1d 723G 54G 611G 8% /home > > Certainly not what I was hoping for. > > I've tried both i386 and amd64 releases. > > Especially since that apparent limit is much smaller than 1TB. Curious. Is there any remaining space for a second slice, as in da0s2?