Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:12:29 +0100 From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com> To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why 24/192kHz sound is not a solution. Message-ID: <1355353949.2651.56.camel@q> In-Reply-To: <CAA7C2qhMWUS2u6=EPBfmh359h7tkig54ci-AOxaw=KwUOx9jBA@mail.gmail.com> References: <1354723094926-5766828.post@n5.nabble.com> <CAA7C2qjCbe_yJMCpKFj67aXtSBiWC%2BGwHMkACcerUGB3bWo1pg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFU734wQ0YikLwhCE5%2Bhri7W5V1pHhZWk1tVgbhgD299wvi9Mw@mail.gmail.com> <20121207045002.V24050@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <CAA7C2qhMWUS2u6=EPBfmh359h7tkig54ci-AOxaw=KwUOx9jBA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 17:13 -0800, VDR User wrote: > Additionally, if you don't understand why or > when 24/192 is needed, then you also don't understand why or when it > isn't. It's not needed to produce professional music or video sound. My RME card provides 192 KHz, but I never tested it. Please, can you give an example, when there will be an audible difference between 192 KHz and < 192 KHz? > > > If the sound chip accepts 24/192, > > > then our sound system should be able to use this capability. > > > > Surely. > > That is the actual subject here and I'm sure most people would agree > to the above. At least I hope so! If possible everything should be supported. FWIW I'll test FreeBSD, because I'm missing features of my RME HDSPe AIO on Linux [1]. For producing music, other features are more important, than 192 KHz are. Regards, Ralf [1] I still had no time to set up FreeBSD to test the BSD's HDSPe driver.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1355353949.2651.56.camel>