Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 18:07:53 -0500 (EST) From: Mike E <kutulu@kutulu.org> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/45276: libesmtp uses undefined PF_UNSPEC constant. Message-ID: <200211132307.gADN7rae024955@basement.kutulu.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 45276 >Category: ports >Synopsis: libesmtp uses undefined PF_UNSPEC constant. >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed Nov 13 15:10:01 PST 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Kutulu >Release: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 >Organization: >Environment: System: FreeBSD basement.kutulu.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Tue Nov 12 15:43:48 EST 2002 root@basement.kutulu.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GATEWAY i386 >Description: libesmtp attempts to use PF_UNSPEC without properly ensuring that it is defined. The port defines it's POSIX level as 199506 (by defining __POSIX_C_SOURCE in config.h) and the X/Open compatibility level to 500 (_XOPEN_SOURCE in config.h). However, these cause the value of __BSD_VISIBLE to remain undefined, and thus PF_UNSPEC is not visible. (Coincidentally, defining __POSIX_C_SOURCE and _XOPEN_SOURCE in this case is redundant .. the second redefines the first anyway). >How-To-Repeat: build /usr/ports/mail/libesmtp >Fix: I commented out the _POSIX_C_SOURCE and _XOPEN_SOURCE feature-test macros and the port successfully built. However, I'm unsure of all the ramifications of using these feature-test macros, so I'm not sure this is the ideal permanent fix. It also generated additional warnings about ISO C89 and 'long long' values that were not present before. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211132307.gADN7rae024955>