From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 24 21:10:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE177D5 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910521017 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r5OLA2aJ020511 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r5OLA2Q1020510; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:10:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:10:02 GMT Message-Id: <201306242110.r5OLA2Q1020510@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Subject: Re: docs/177457: diskinfo(8): diskinfo -v shows inacurate drive size X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:10:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/177457; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: Jason Unovitch Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/177457: diskinfo(8): diskinfo -v shows inacurate drive size Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:05:07 -0700 In message <51C876FF.4030302@gmail.com>, you wrote: >Isn't this the classic case of the OS using a base of 1024 to calculate >size and the hard drive manufacturer using 1000 for the same purpose? I do not believe so, no. It has been awhile since I filed this PR, but I believe that the non-matching numbers I was looking at were sector counts... NOT byte counts. The number of sectors on a drive is the number of sectors on that drive. It should not be different between different tools one might use to look at that number.