From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 18:58:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9757F106564A; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:58:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cowens@greatbaysoftware.com) Received: from ecbiz102.inmotionhosting.com (ecbiz102.inmotionhosting.com [70.39.235.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D25F8FC15; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:58:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-50-136-23-27.hsd1.nh.comcast.net ([50.136.23.27]:65101 helo=jack.bspruce.com) by ecbiz102.inmotionhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sfbig-0006Hi-N8; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:58:06 -0400 Message-ID: <4FDB85BB.6040708@greatbaysoftware.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:58:03 -0400 From: Charles Owens Organization: Great Bay Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brian W." References: <20120615110618.4CF5F1065689@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ecbiz102.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - greatbaysoftware.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:58:08 -0000 No reason other than history... will be changing over at some point. Charles Owens Great Bay Software, Inc. On 6/15/12 10:38 AM, Brian W. wrote: > > Curious why you are preferring i386 +PAE as opposed to amd64? > > On Jun 15, 2012 4:09 AM, "Charles Owens" > wrote: > > Yes, of course. So far I can say that the major shift appears to > have occurred between 8.1 and 8.2 . > > Thanks, > > Charles Owens > Great Bay Software, Inc. > > Sent from my phone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Adrian Chadd" > > To: "Charles Owens" > > Cc: > > Subject: mfi(4) IO performance regression, post 8.1 > Date: Fri, Jun 15, 2012 1:55 am > > > Hm, can you try different subversion checkouts of the kernel tree > between 8.1 and 8.3, to pinpoint which commit(s) broke things? > > > > ADrian > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " >