From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 21 12:43:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFDA16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:43:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CA443D1F for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:43:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6LChQSn007783 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 05:43:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6LChPdo007782 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 05:43:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 05:43:26 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200407211243.i6LChPdo007782@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <82975.1090412343@critter.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: Any idea why timespec* is _KERNEL stuff only? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:43:26 -0000 >To: Xin LI >From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" >Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:19:03 +0200 >Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Any idea why timespec* is _KERNEL stuff only? >Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org >>Oh... Shall I ask for a review for a change of the current behavior, or hav= >>e my >>own version of timespec* macros in my program, for compability reasons? >I belive this is a question for our standards people... I belive they >have a mail-list of their own, probably standards@freebsd.org Correct. Peace, david (current hat: postmaster@freebsd.org) -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org I do not "unsubscribe" from email "services" to which I have not explicitly subscribed. Rather, I block spammers' access to SMTP servers I control, and encourage others who are in a position to do so to do likewise.