From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jul 14 08:13:45 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id AA3CE16A41F; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:13:45 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:13:45 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050714081345.GA20050@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200507132352.j6DNqtUS011697@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<1121327072.38958.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1121327072.38958.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/djvulibre Makefile
	ports/textproc/wordnet Makefile
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:13:45 -0000

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 09:44:32AM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> Mikhail Teterin p??e v st 13. 07. 2005 v 23:52 +0000:
> > mi          2005-07-13 23:52:55 UTC
> > 
> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> > 
> >   Modified files:
> >     graphics/djvulibre   Makefile 
> >     textproc/wordnet     Makefile 
> >   Log:
> >   Remove the requirements for particular shared library versions on two
> >   more ports, which I created.
> 
> Is this something we agreed to do, or you are going as a sole man
> against long term practice?

I also do not like this change.  It's very convenient to see what
happens to port with its dependencies getting particular .so version bump
(as it can be more than just PORTREVISION++).  With your change, it's harded
to track.

If I were you, I'd back 'em out.

./danfe