From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  7 16:13:17 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF3B106579C;
	Tue,  7 Apr 2009 16:13:17 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru)
Received: from smtp.timeweb.ru (smtp.timeweb.ru [217.170.79.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0118FC24;
	Tue,  7 Apr 2009 16:13:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru)
Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=hive.panopticon)
	by smtp.timeweb.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>)
	id 1LrDvK-0001hb-HP; Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:13:18 +0400
Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.32])
	by hive.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666DC116C0;
	Tue,  7 Apr 2009 20:13:26 +0400 (MSD)
Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9106E10883A; Tue,  7 Apr 2009 20:13:01 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 20:13:01 +0400
From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru>
To: Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090407161301.GB64876@hades.panopticon>
References: <op.urotvvn79aq2h7@localhost>
	<20090401113857.GO1964@hades.panopticon>
	<3cb459ed0904020821u3051c572l6461274ae7ff118b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090402224413.GV1964@hades.panopticon>
	<3cb459ed0904030632x215f1e3n25363903a80b5639@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090403155011.GC60788@hades.panopticon>
	<op.urzlgfhu9aq2h7@localhost>
	<3cb459ed0904070728w162d56dey1359c65c2394635d@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090407145624.GA64876@hades.panopticon>
	<3cb459ed0904070842j73d8ee0cree667f8c1de75344@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0904070842j73d8ee0cree667f8c1de75344@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, pav@FreeBSD.org,
	lwhsu@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:13:20 -0000

* Alexander Churanov (alexanderchuranov@gmail.com) wrote:

> > We'll need an exp-run for it anyway, so I guess it's OK.
> > If you have a patch ready, I suggest to file a PR and mail pav@ to do
> > exp-run for it. If there are no major failures, we can push it into the
> > tree, else we won't be bored during the freeze fixing it.
> 
> As I understand this, it's OK to file a PR for just updating to 1.38,
> but port re-organization is delayed until 7.2 is released. Is this
> correct?

Better ask pav (cc'd). I myself see no reason why not do both update and
split in one go.

-- 
Dmitry Marakasov   .   55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56  9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amdmi3@amdmi3.ru  ..:  jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru    http://www.amdmi3.ru