From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 15 08:02:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2464D1065672 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03848FC17 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan.naumov@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so1908196ana.13 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:02:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9V0uIrmsAxGCJPdPbY/IsFexIX9mL4ZTzD50pYD4mb0=; b=vp4LX30e3sAy9I5YPfJNuqGrROg6POZxdbcyQge0HQWVH+K+ddb0TBt7o+uI7dXxxS b75VCpDG5f0Mugg08BggxWKzIDagLw2jl86NiIlW+PPnzu8KOZ3+S5OsnDTw4pyku9/L 7AfvpedpHUZ3wARGjX93zlsP/gnbBhFdmm8Gw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JUTqpgslSNRsGkrLougrX+buKvISxzFPYD6yxHgZlO5OY9ONr68UjqmyU9FBF1ycT4 XdItg508oV6/L9l2uCE4IDB6zA74qa8pmqG2o9gFneFkbXArJfSvj+JuUScL98cJtBxF 0wh4MTmMJveE+TcVrvxKaXH3Kc8AFq5M5q2a4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.201.11 with SMTP id y11mr4141533anf.190.1245052976242; Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:02:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:02:56 +0300 Message-ID: From: Dan Naumov To: Pete French Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does this disk/filesystem layout look sane to you? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:02:57 -0000 If this is true, some magic has been done to the FreeBSD port of ZFS, because according to SUN documentation is is definitely not supposed to be possible. - Dan Naumov On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Pete French wrote: >> The new 2tb disk you buy can very often be actually a few sectors >> smaller then the disk you are trying to replace, this in turn will >> lead to zfs not accepting the new disk as a replacement, because it's >> smaller (no matter how small). > > Heh - you are in for a pleasent surprise my friend! ;-) If you actually > try this in practice you will find ZFS *does* accept a smaller drive as > a replacement. Preseumably to cope with the natural variability in sector > size that you describe. > > Surprised me too the first time I saw it... > > -pete. >