From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 10 10: 0:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.122.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA89B37B422 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:00:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f3AH0CJ89397; Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:00:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:00:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Greg Lehey Cc: Danny Howard , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: fdisk & disklabel dont work! In-Reply-To: <20010410180942.Y64481@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: X-All-Your-Base: are belong to us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Greg Lehey wrote: > > But there are other Adaptec controllers (eg, those built on the Intel > > L440GX+ motherboard) that do _not_ work in a dedicated situation. > > I haven't seen any, and I haven't seen any proof that this statement > is correct. I have some. :) Look in the -hackers archives for me asking about a strange loader dump. That's what happens when you do dedicated mode on Adaptec hardware... it gets _really_ angry and corrupts the loader. The fault address is *in* the Adaptec firmware. Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message