From owner-freebsd-java Mon Oct 9 8:29:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9F737B66F for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:29:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131]) by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19690; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:29:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com) Received: (from nate@localhost) by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19151; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:29:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:29:47 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010091529.JAA19151@nomad.yogotech.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ernst de Haan Cc: FreeBSD Java mailing list Subject: Re: Port for current binary JDK ? In-Reply-To: <20001009150505.A7933@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> References: <20001009150505.A7933@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I haven't followed the recent developments very close, but can we > already ship a binary JDK for FreeBSD or do Nate and Gary still need > to sign some papers or so? I think you mean Greg, and yes. I was told Friday that the paperwork should be happening this week, but I'm a slight bit suspicious after the long wait we've had so for. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message