From owner-freebsd-java  Mon Oct  9  8:29:51 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9F737B66F
	for <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon,  9 Oct 2000 08:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131])
	by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19690;
	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:29:47 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com)
Received: (from nate@localhost)
	by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19151;
	Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:29:47 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from nate)
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 09:29:47 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200010091529.JAA19151@nomad.yogotech.com>
From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Ernst de Haan <ernst@jollem.com>
Cc: FreeBSD Java mailing list <freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Port for current binary JDK ?
In-Reply-To: <20001009150505.A7933@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>
References: <20001009150505.A7933@c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> I haven't followed the recent developments very close, but can we
> already ship a binary JDK for FreeBSD or do Nate and Gary still need
> to sign some papers or so?

I think you mean Greg, and yes.  I was told Friday that the paperwork
should be happening this week, but I'm a slight bit suspicious after the
long wait we've had so for.



Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message