From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 6 19:47:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F55616B7DD for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638D343D8D for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:46:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k56Jkrx68598 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:46:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "'FreeBSD-Questions Questions'" Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 12:46:53 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 In-reply-to: <200606050258.k552w9gx022885@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Does FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE support the 8237R? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:47:29 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Jerry McAllister [mailto:jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu] >Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 7:58 PM >To: danial_thom@yahoo.com >Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Scott Hiemstra; 'FreeBSD-Questions Questions' >Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE support the 8237R? > >I think by now, people have lost track of who has posted what. Probably since your too used to top-posting. >I don't really care what the responses were. Sure, sure. > It is just >that Teddy got all flamey about the original poster telling >someone that their response was not helpful. The OP didn't simply politely tell someone their response wasn't helpful. If he had I never would have posted. The OP basically told one of the respondents to shove their fucking response up their ass. > Seems like he >likes to dish it out but isn't as big on lunching on his >own menu. > Take your meds, Jerry, your delusional again. Ted