From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 23 11:45:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B8A37B401 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop015.verizon.net (pop015pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0448443F85 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([141.149.47.46]) by pop015.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030723184534.PYHT20810.pop015.verizon.net@mac.com>; Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:45:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3F1ED7BF.6050204@mac.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 14:45:19 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Morgan Salomon References: <8AE4DA75-BCC1-11D7-9DA1-000A957FF666@pacbell.net> <87d6g1zwt7.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <1058980661.3981.0.camel@jupiter.main.gaddis.org> <3F1ED7C5.5000500@zog.net> In-Reply-To: <3F1ED7C5.5000500@zog.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop015.verizon.net from [141.149.47.46] at Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:45:34 -0500 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:45:36 -0000 John Morgan Salomon wrote: > Unless you have a different instances listening on different interfaces/IPs > as master/slave for the same domain if you only have one machine--some > registrars will not permit master & slave on the same IP. > Or can BIND9 handle this in a single instance? The requirement to have seperate nameservers is for redundancy: you are expected to actually have two real, seperate machines on two different IP addresses, so that DNS continues to work even if one nameserver fails. -- -Chuck