Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 15:10:35 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: rittle@rsch.comm.mot.com Cc: es@hawkwind.utcs.toronto.edu, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Small memory handling error in es-0.9-beta1.tar.gz Message-ID: <20001208151035.D451@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <200012080119.eB81JDe98193@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>; from rittle@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com on Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:19:13PM -0600 References: <200012080119.eB81JDe98193@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Your patch has been added to the FreeBSD port, and ljrittle@acm.org is now listed as the port maintainer. Congratulations for the new reason for people to bug you ;) G'luck, Peter -- "yields falsehood, when appended to its quotation." yields falsehood, when appended to its quotation. On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 07:19:13PM -0600, Loren James Rittle wrote: > I have no idea if anyone besides me still runs es (or anyone cares to > maintain their copies), but here is a patch to the last public release > (that I know of). It bites you when you configure --with-readline and > then proceed to enter a really long command line under the built > shell. To ensure that you don't accidentally reverse patch it to a > source tree where it was already done: It is strictly not legal to > call the sequence: ``efree(X); X = erealloc(X, Y);''. > > I always love it when you can fix a bug by removing code. ;-) > > [Note to BSD ports maintainer: The port lives in /usr/ports/shells/es > and this patch has been tested as /usr/ports/shells/es/files/patch-ab . > Also (responding to the comment in revision 1.9 of the port's > Makefile), as a non-committer and only if it helps, I would be happy > to be listed in the Makefile as MAINTAINER= ljrittle@acm.org .] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001208151035.D451>