From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 22:29:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192C3106566C for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BFA8FC08 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 22:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 30502 invoked by uid 399); 9 Feb 2009 22:29:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.19?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 9 Feb 2009 22:29:54 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4990AE58.1020502@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:29:44 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leslie Jensen References: <498088F7.5000800@eskk.nu> <790a9fff0901281130l31a35ba9pc4bde54f54ed1fec@mail.gmail.com> <4980D4BE.8050104@eskk.nu> <790a9fff0901291123s12108fcex358a448572d20154@mail.gmail.com> <498B2F54.2000602@eskk.nu> <498CD6DE.60109@FreeBSD.org> <49905F17.1020804@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: <49905F17.1020804@eskk.nu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: yanefbsd@gmail.com, swhetzel@gmail.com, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Message when updating ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:29:57 -0000 Leslie Jensen wrote: > OK! Thank you Doug and Scot. > > Here's what I did: > > Portmaster --check-depends > > I deleted all the dependencies that was not ok. > > After that I reinstalled the ports that had had the wrong dependencies > and then I ran Portmaster --check-depends again and everything looked > good :-) I'm relieved to hear that portmaster was able to help you solve your problem. > As Garrett points out, I would also very much like to know how did those > entries get in there?? So would I. My guess would be that someone used 'pkg_delete -f', but that's just a guess. hth, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection