From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Thu Nov 10 16:23:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB93C3A449 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [148.251.9.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2767E1E5; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.17.133] (unknown [89.113.128.32]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D7F5FCF; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:23:19 +0300 (MSK) Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ZFS L2ARC checksum errors after compression References: <921575537.20161029143626@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3dae7691-fcd1-b3b9-445c-b81d6f0cdc52@FreeBSD.org> <3bd7cb79-ec5a-3b7c-0642-24a7b1f001e6@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon , freebsd-fs From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <2e6ae135-202a-5c31-0554-cf16f56247f6@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:23:17 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3bd7cb79-ec5a-3b7c-0642-24a7b1f001e6@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:23:28 -0000 On 04.11.2016 17:20, Andriy Gapon wrote: > because of the confusing variable names I made a mistake in the patch that I > offered you. Could you please try a new slight different patch? > Also, I think that there could be another problem in addition to the one that I > see. But I am quite busy at the moment, no time to investigate. Maybe on the > weekend or some time next week. > Thank you for reporting and testing. Looks like this patch could not be used with latest stable/10 (r308483), there are compilation errors. -- // Lev Serebryakov