From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 30 9:47:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3149037B71C for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:47:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 526 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Mar 2001 17:46:31 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:46:31 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Patrick M Doane Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/25816: Updated lang/ocaml port for version 3.01 Message-ID: <20010330204631.A475@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Patrick M Doane , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <200103171354.f2HDs5Z14260@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from patrick@watson.org on Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 05:30:35PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Mar 17, 2001 at 05:30:35PM -0500, Patrick M Doane wrote: > Certainly, > > Here is a unified diff of the changes from 3.00 to 3.01. > > If diffs are the preferred method for receiving updates to ports, I didn't > see that in the Porter's Handbook. A reference in section 2.6 Submitting > the Port would be a sensible place for some more specific instructions. Actually, it is in the Porter's Handbook - the third paragraph of Chapter 14, "Upgrading", begins with the words.. If the maintainer asks you to do the upgrade or there is not any such person to begin with, please make the upgrade and send the recursive diff (either unified or context diff is fine, but port committers appear to prefer unified diff more) of the new and old ports directories to us [...] G'luck, Peter -- If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message