Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 10:28:04 -0700 From: Patrick Powell <papowell@astart.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox 4 - Beta Message-ID: <4D84E7A4.6060409@astart.com> In-Reply-To: <20110319080231.684d0fd9@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <rhk948-1bv1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4D723F43.4040506@FreeBSD.org> <4lhc48-s332.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <4D73BD6A.7000404@swa.org.ru> <8v9d48-0qi1.ln1@news.hansenet.de> <AANLkTi=mdLSHo_PRdBsKAdzdLBhUpMSoRhmnc_XtmxiO@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=WmhP_=4p_i2Fu6qgKMZh3h3S-4%2BNgPbgjRd=0@mail.gmail.com> <20110319080231.684d0fd9@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/19/11 00:02, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 08:07:28 -0600 > "Edwin L. Culp W."<edwinlculp@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm assuming that we are close to having firefox4 in the tree as >> firefox. It can't be too soon. I have not found any drawbacks to it >> in the couple weeks of testing. >> > Unfortunately, it still goes crazy like the older versions and eats 100% > of the CPU for no apparent reason. > > Otherwise it's no worse than 3.x was. > Ummm... does it support Java? There were some issues with newer versions of firefox requiring newer versions of the JDK which have not been ported/updated. -- Patrick Powell Astart Technologies papowell@astart.com 1530 Jamacha Road, Suite X, Network and System San Diego, CA 92019 Consulting 858-874-6543 Web Site: www.astart.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D84E7A4.6060409>