From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 17 01:24:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4541E16A4CE for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 01:24:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao04.cox.net (lakermmtao04.cox.net [68.230.240.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB72A43D2F for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 01:24:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.30.24]) by lakermmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20041017012407.XPIJ6435.lakermmtao04.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 21:24:07 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id i9H1O80u003580; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:24:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 20:24:03 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" Message-ID: <20041016202403.7928c26d@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: <19260.1097963444@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <16753.38774.621295.6356@ran.psg.com> <19260.1097963444@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Randy Bush cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no echo console X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 01:24:10 -0000 On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 23:50:44 +0200, "Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote: > In message <16753.38774.621295.6356@ran.psg.com>, Randy Bush writes: > >> Does it depend on which shell you use for single-user mode ? > > > >uh, make the test you want clear, plz. i am fried today. > > > >root's shell is /usr/local/bin/bash (no comments, please:-) > > > >i am seeing the problem as root in multiluser. i don't spend > >much time in single abuser, so can't say. > > Ahh, that's different then. > > I'll hunt this one down tomorrow. I'm quite certain now that it's occurring after every run of portupgrade. I don't get the same if I cd to a port's dir and do a build; only if I use portupgrade. Weird. I have no idea what's going on. -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"