Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:43:38 -0800 From: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org> To: jT <toyj@union.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Steve Tremblett <tremblett@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Intel 5100 WiFi Message-ID: <4920F67A.1010103@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <9f8af95f0811162027g41c4460fq89cf106ad64cf505@mail.gmail.com> References: <ee2f4e60811161644x6ad6fd4ey9bccd8db6ab62ae7@mail.gmail.com> <9f8af95f0811161819i58e3f8bep851ca9ae25c2a43f@mail.gmail.com> <4920E8BE.7080208@freebsd.org> <9f8af95f0811162027g41c4460fq89cf106ad64cf505@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The 4965 firmware license does not require an ack via the loader
tunable. This used to be true but was changed recently as I was
mistaken about the license (only iwi and ipw firmware requires the end
user acknowledge the EULA).
Everything else that was said seemed spot on.
Sam
jT wrote:
> Sam,
> I know you are busy, but can you explain what about my response was
> wrong when you say doesn't require sysctl ack -- you mean
> acknowledgment? I just would like to know for my future reference and
> Steve sorry for my misinformation.
>
>
>> iwn firmware does not require a sysctl ack.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4920F67A.1010103>