Date: 30 Nov 2004 09:33:28 -0500 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: dave <dmehler26@woh.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade and index Message-ID: <44llcj76fb.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <000501c4d68f$74a82320$0400a8c0@satellite> References: <000501c4d68f$74a82320$0400a8c0@satellite>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"dave" <dmehler26@woh.rr.com> writes: > I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current ports. > I've lately switched to make fetchindex vs. portsdb -uU which goes much > faster. My problem is whenever i do a make search for a port the index.5 > file is regenerated and that takes an extremely long time. I was wondering > if this is normal behavior, and what if anything i could do to speed it up? That certainly doesn't happen to me. Are you sure you *have* a /usr/ports/INDEX-5 before the rebuild gets triggered?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44llcj76fb.fsf>