Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:14:06 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Tiwei Bie <btw@mail.ustc.edu.cn>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Finish the task 'sysctl reporting current working directory' Message-ID: <5457394E.4050905@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20141103064052.GA1739@freebsd> References: <1414987325-23280-1-git-send-email-btw@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <20141103051908.GC29497@dft-labs.eu> <20141103064052.GA1739@freebsd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/3/14, 2:40 PM, Tiwei Bie wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 06:19:08AM +0100, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:02:05PM +0800, Tiwei Bie wrote: >> >>> @@ -657,6 +657,7 @@ TAILQ_HEAD(sysctl_ctx_list, sysctl_ctx_entry); >>> #define KERN_PROC_UMASK 39 /* process umask */ >>> #define KERN_PROC_OSREL 40 /* osreldate for process binary */ >>> #define KERN_PROC_SIGTRAMP 41 /* signal trampoline location */ >>> +#define KERN_PROC_CWD 42 /* process current working directory */ >>> >>> why are you using a fixed sysctl MIB number? I thought we were moving towards dynamic sysctls when we add new ones.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5457394E.4050905>