From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jun 5 23:28:23 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA00816 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 23:28:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.camalott.com (root@[208.203.140.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA00810 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 23:28:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: from detlev.UUCP (tex-63.camalott.com [208.229.74.63] (may be forged)) by mail.camalott.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA29770; Sat, 6 Jun 1998 01:27:16 -0500 Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA08835; Sat, 6 Jun 1998 01:28:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from joelh) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 01:28:11 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199806060628.BAA08835@detlev.UUCP> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: gcc 2.8.1 port From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm looking at updating our gcc 2.8.1 port to allow for our recent a.out/elf split. If possible, I'd like to add support for both elf and a.out in one compiler while I'm at it. I had in mind just changing the freebsd.h file. Is this possible to do, just by updating freebsd.h? But from what I can tell, the .h file can handle it. Is the situation probably stable enough that I can go ahead and do this, and not have to redo it next week? Finally, is anybody else working on this, or has somebody already written it? Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message