Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 20:05:12 -0500 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA <knu@idaemons.org> Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, yasuf@bsdclub.org Subject: Re: Call for a new virtual category: "ruby" Message-ID: <20000806200512.A452@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86zompvqgd.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>; from knu@idaemons.org on Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 09:56:50AM %2B0900 References: <86og37a5jc.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> <20000806175148.D343@FreeBSD.org> <86zompvqgd.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 09:56:50AM +0900, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > Six. databases/ruby-postgres, japanese/rubytk, lang/irb, lang/ruby, > x11-toolkits/ruby-gtk, and x11-toolkits/rubytk. Now I know there's minimal overhead in creating a new virtual category, but to my eyes, 6 is somewhat on the low side. Perhaps we can come to some consensus on exactly how many ports are needed for a virtual category. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000806200512.A452>