From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 8 22:23:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC9C984 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 22:23:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C5C1C70 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 22:22:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=u+Bwc9JL7tMNtl/i9xObSTPSFclN5AOtXcIZY5dPsHA= c=1 sm=2 a=ctSXsGKhotwA:10 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=V5z4IuhVU5kA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=GzJd4s-eAAAA:8 a=MUmArWVO6LuOtltXXSgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqIEAHU621GDaFve/2dsb2JhbABZFoMlTYMIvXqBMHSCIwEBBAEjVgUWGAICDRkCWQYTiAkGDKdckSuBJo0DgQ40B4JUgRwDmHyQH4MtIIE1Nw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,1022,1363147200"; d="scan'208";a="39456094" Received: from muskoka.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.222]) by esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2013 18:22:52 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9571B3F11; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:22:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 18:22:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: Berend de Boer Message-ID: <2014252440.3314312.1373322172877.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <87d2qt1tof.wl%berend@pobox.com> Subject: Re: Terrible NFS4 performance: FreeBSD 9.1 + ZFS + AWS EC2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.202] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.1_GA_2790 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/7.2.1_GA_2790) Cc: freebsd-fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 22:23:00 -0000 Berend de Boer wrote: > >>>>> "Rick" == Rick Macklem writes: > > Rick> Please try this patch: > > Hi Rick, > > Could you please reroll the patc hagainst 9.1-RELEASE? Not sure what > version of FreeBSD you made this for. I haven't a clue, either, to be honest;-) > I have 9.1-RELEASE. Get three > failures: > I don't have a copy of 9.1-RELEASE handy, but here's one for stable/9. If that still fails, just email and I'll download 9.1-RELEASE and create one for it. http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/drc4-stable9.patch rick > # patch --check -p0 < ~/drc4.patch > Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |--- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c.orig 2013-01-07 > |09:04:13.000000000 -0500 > |+++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c 2013-03-12 22:42:05.000000000 > |-0400 > -------------------------- > Patching file fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 160. > Hunk #2 succeeded at 216. > Hunk #3 succeeded at 271. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 357. > Hunk #5 succeeded at 370. > Hunk #6 succeeded at 381. > Hunk #7 succeeded at 396 with fuzz 2. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 426. > Hunk #9 succeeded at 444. > Hunk #10 succeeded at 468. > Hunk #11 failed at 476. > Hunk #12 failed at 501. > Hunk #13 succeeded at 523. > Hunk #14 succeeded at 531. > Hunk #15 succeeded at 547. > Hunk #16 succeeded at 568. > Hunk #17 succeeded at 579. > Hunk #18 succeeded at 601. > Hunk #19 succeeded at 665. > Hunk #20 succeeded at 674. > Hunk #21 failed at 683. > Hunk #22 succeeded at 718. > Hunk #23 succeeded at 729. > Hunk #24 succeeded at 750. > Hunk #25 succeeded at 779. > Hunk #26 succeeded at 788. > Hunk #27 succeeded at 803. > Hunk #28 succeeded at 828. > Hunk #29 succeeded at 927. > Hunk #30 succeeded at 943. > 3 out of 30 hunks failed--saving rejects to > fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdcache.c.rej > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |--- fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c.orig 2013-03-02 18:19:34.000000000 > |-0500 > |+++ fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c 2013-03-12 17:51:31.000000000 > |-0400 > -------------------------- > Patching file fs/nfsserver/nfs_nfsdport.c using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 59 with fuzz 1 (offset -2 lines). > Hunk #2 succeeded at 3284 (offset -22 lines). > Hunk #3 succeeded at 3351 with fuzz 1 (offset -5 lines). > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |--- fs/nfs/nfsport.h.orig 2013-03-02 18:35:13.000000000 -0500 > |+++ fs/nfs/nfsport.h 2013-03-12 17:51:31.000000000 -0400 > -------------------------- > Patching file fs/nfs/nfsport.h using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 547 (offset -62 lines). > Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... > The text leading up to this was: > -------------------------- > |--- fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h.orig 2013-01-07 09:04:15.000000000 -0500 > |+++ fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h 2013-03-12 18:02:42.000000000 -0400 > -------------------------- > Patching file fs/nfs/nfsrvcache.h using Plan A... > Hunk #1 succeeded at 41. > done > > > I just want to make sure I can apply it cleanly and that it's not a > mistake I made when making this work when it doesn't. > > -- > All the best, > > Berend de Boer > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Awesome Drupal hosting: https://www.xplainhosting.com/ > >