From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 7 22:24:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3421E1065688 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) Received: from mail.netconsonance.com (mail.netconsonance.com [198.207.204.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4018FC12 for ; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 22:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) Received: from 4.151.178.10.in-addr.arpa (m420e36d0.tmodns.net [208.54.14.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netconsonance.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m57MNvHX063217; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:23:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@netconsonance.com) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netconsonance.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=3.5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.44, AWL=-0.182, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.617] Message-Id: From: Jo Rhett To: Garance A Drosehn In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v924) Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:23:51 -0700 References: <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com><48472DB6.5030909@ samsco.org><6010676B-91B0-4AF8-ACF8-039A59B29331@netconsonance.com><200806 050248.59229.max@love2party.net><20080605083907.GD1028@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <902E9703E6E50776A17E9F92@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <08056909-E1BB-44D4-8DEC-D1A9EFC3E75D@netconsonance.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.924) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 22:24:04 -0000 On Jun 7, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > There is not a single committer that I know of who is convinced > by your argument that we (committers) should sign up for the > additional work of supporting 6.2 for an additional 6 months. I never asked for that. > That is the answer to your "policy concern". > Let me say again: > *That* is the answer to your policy concern. > and: > That *is* the answer to your policy concern. > and: > That is the answer to your *policy* concern. NICE. Go with the insults. Nothing better than pissing off people who work for you for free. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness