From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 30 18:18:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30865106566C; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:18:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [187.95.0.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B2D8FC20; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pop1.hm.net.br (pop1.hm.net.br [189.7.39.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7UIHrYh046930 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:17:54 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.5 at msrv.matik.com.br X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.5.2 msrv.matik.com.br q7UIHrYh046930 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=matik.com.br; s=racoon; t=1346350675; bh=iskC3kPdGiw6UrF7c6NQtdgKx/MFUNCWMN/87VLyBfU=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=ShVTEa2MwXcY47FzG+pf80DjKD1t6StR2WQzwYK20TvBcS/m1CVrDe5u6JuzeGbmZ VC4oVbJVxWWwIm5XuQag1uc8AE65O0vJEyp7/RempgtA1P+YzPsNE2pPgh5Zp1i00y gZImv/PuB/RXUhaxpXG689PE5MNNdhBCWcVhkM+A= Authentication-Results: msrv.matik.com.br; sender-id=pass header.from=joao@matik.com.br; auth=pass (PLAIN); spf=pass smtp.mfrom=joao@matik.com.br Message-ID: <503FAE52.3030209@matik.com.br> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 15:17:54 -0300 From: joaoBR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120805 Firefox/14.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guido Falsi References: <20120829124352.42122ebmrgeuzkjc@webmail.ime.usp.br> <503F2E12.80403@passap.ru> <503F9C9E.4090705@FreeBSD.org> <503FA185.8090004@matik.com.br> <503FA3E5.2050806@FreeBSD.org> <503FA88C.3060701@matik.com.br> <503FAB3E.9050101@FreeBSD.org> <503FAC80.1070408@matik.com.br> <503FAD12.7090000@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <503FAD12.7090000@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-296.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL=-0.956,BAYES_00=-1.9,DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,DKIM_VALID=-0.1,DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449,RCVD_IN_PBL=3.335,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL=1.31,SPF_PASS=-0.001,TW_GL=0.077,USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100,USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST=-100,USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100 msrv.matik.com.br 1282; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Reported 0 times. [127.0.0.2] [1 mail.matik.com.br.] [127.0.0.6] [127.0.0.11] [187.95.0.181] autolearn=no ASN AS28573 189.7.36.0/22 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2-hm_201202.c (2011-06-06) on msrv.matik.com.br Cc: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Radeon HD 6250 Support X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:18:03 -0000 On 30/08/2012 15:12, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 08/30/12 20:10, joaoBR wrote: >> On 30/08/2012 15:04, Guido Falsi wrote: >>> On 08/30/12 19:53, joaoBR wrote: >>>> On 30/08/2012 14:33, Guido Falsi wrote: >>>>> On 08/30/12 19:23, joaoBR wrote: >>>>>> On 30/08/2012 14:02, Guido Falsi wrote: >>>>>>> On 08/30/12 11:10, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>>>>>>> I've created a patch per your request. The patch is only build >>>>>>>> tested (at redports). Please give it a try. Awaithing for a >>>>>>>> feedback. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have tested running this patch and it seems to work fine here >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some info: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> FreeBSD marvin.madpilot.net 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #5 >>>>>>> r239127 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> drm0: on vgapci0 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>> >>>>>> what returns 'glxinfo | grep -i renderer' for this card on your >>>>>> machine? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> mad@marvin:~ [0]> glxinfo | grep -i renderer >>>>> IRQ's not enabled, falling back to busy waits: 2 0 >>>>> OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R600 (RV710 954F) TCL >>>>> >>>> >>>> thanks, was it the same before the patch? >>> >>> I downgraded now to check. Perfectly identical. >>> >> >> >> well, then I guess the patch does not affect your card, or better your, >> card is still an older radeon card which still did/does opengl anyway >> >> > > I See. Since original poster was not willing to test the patch I thought > to give it a try and report anyway. I was hoping this could help. > of course it helps, at least for me, much more should post their experience, I am trying to compile a list of radeon cards which are actually opengl capable thanks -- Joćo Martins (JoaoBR) Infomatik Development Team http://wipserver.matik.com.br +55 11 4249.2222