Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2020 18:28:40 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251412] [patch] math/py-pandas Update to 1.1.4 (Python 3.9 compatible) Message-ID: <bug-251412-21822-GsnKBWOY0Y@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-251412-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-251412-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251412 j.david.lists@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #220024|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #4 from j.david.lists@gmail.com --- Created attachment 220077 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D220077&action= =3Dedit Same patch, but restore PORTEPOCH Here is the patch with PORTEPOCH restored. I only use poudriere so I don't know how to do "make makepatch" in that context. This patch seems to apply and work, but feel free to modify it as needed. With respect to math/py-statsmodels and devel/py-xarray, I am a sysadmin no= t a Python programmer so I know very little about it. But I have encountered t= hat the Python numeric stuff can be incredibly tricky to build and combine, and= not everything works in every combination. If that stuff isn't commonly used, blanket adding it to RUN_DEPENDS may have serious unanticipated consequence= s.=20 It's not something I feel I know enough about to mess with. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251412-21822-GsnKBWOY0Y>