From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Oct 10 10:30:22 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D7316A4B3
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9439A43F85
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9AHULFY098539
	for <freebsd-doc@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h9AHULoJ098537;
	Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200310101730.h9AHULoJ098537@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:30:22 -0000

The following reply was made to PR docs/57824; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/57824: ed(4) man page does not mention that ed requires
 miibus
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 21:28:51 +0400 (MSD)

 [...]
 >  > I am pretty sure we can wait until after 4.9.
 >
 >  Erm... What do you mean, 'wait'?  What Tom is saying is that
 >  the branch currently referred to as -STABLE, which *is* what was
 >  formerly known as 4.8-STABLE, but is right now called 4.9-RC due
 >  to the pending 4.9-RELEASE -- well, that branch already documents
 >  that ed needs miibus.  I can also confirm that: my ed(4) manpage
 >  shows 'device miibus' in the synopsis section.
 >
 >  This was already MFC'd in ed.4 rev. 1.19.2.10 from February 17th,
 >  committed by - surprise, surprise - Tom Rhodes :)
 
 You are quite right :-)
 
 -- 
 Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org