Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:55:37 -0500 From: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Marking a port as "dead" for 3-STABLE? Message-ID: <20010202155537.B71397@peitho.fxp.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0102022148400.588-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 09:52:10PM %2B0100 References: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0102022148400.588-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 09:52:10PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Some time ago the Wine port stopped compiling on 3-STABLE systems, with > a failure mode that I cannot reproduce on any of my 4-STABLE boxes nor > analyse ``remotely''. > > As this port does not make sense for ``conservative'' setups anyway, it > does not seems worth analysing and working around this problem, so I'd > like to mark the port as "dead"/unapplicable for 3-STABLE. > > Is there some way to do so, like REQUIRE=4-STABLE or somethink like that > in the port Makefile? > Mark BROKEN if OSVERSION < 400000 (lots of examples in the ports tree) -- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010202155537.B71397>