Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 00:17:48 +0100 (MET) From: Sascha Schumann <sas@schell.de> To: Martin Husemann <martin@rumolt.teuto.de> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Markus_D=F6hr?= <doehrm@aubi.de>, hm@hcs.de, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Support for ITK? (Comment) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9812100016150.19964-100000@guerilla.foo.bar> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9812092347100.19792-100000@guerilla.foo.bar>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Martin Husemann wrote:
>
> > > IMHO I think, that writing a driver for this card cannot be so difficult,
> > > because the source for the driver is available on Linux and can IMHO be
> > > adapted to *BSD,
> >
> > Writing any driver for any card is "not so difficult". There are even cards
> > with good documentation waiting for someone to finish a driver (my daic driver
> > for old active Diehl/Eicon cards is a good example).
> >
> > There is no benefit per se to support any card. We are not fighting a battle
> > against I4L to support more cards then they do - we would have lost that
> > battle from the start. And we don't even fight a battle "our drivers are
> > better written than your's are" - although at least to me this is a quite
> > apealing challenge (and we would have won that from the start!).
>
> Can you exaggerate on your last sentence? I see I4L as a feature rich,
s/exaggerate/elaborate/
Regards,
Sascha Schumann |
Consultant | finger sas@schell.de
| for PGP public key
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.05.9812100016150.19964-100000>