From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 26 23:08:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F51416A40F; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:08:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sippysoft.com (gk.360sip.com [72.236.70.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5D343D46; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:08:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.47] ([204.244.149.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k8QN8crb057089 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:08:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4519B2E5.9000304@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:08:21 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Sippy Software, Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <200609261608.k8QG8TYB044266@repoman.freebsd.org> <200609261313.03759.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200609261313.03759.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 local_apic.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:08:44 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 26 September 2006 12:08, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> sobomax 2006-09-26 16:08:29 UTC >> >> FreeBSD src repository >> >> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) >> sys/i386/i386 local_apic.c >> Log: >> Revert 1.17.2.8, which reportedly causes problems on some hardware. > > The report I saw was that it broke ULE in general. Are you going to revert it > from amd64 as well? Yes, you are right - this is ULE specific bug. In fact, quick grep of the ULE code reveals that it doesn't honor hlt_cpus_mask, so that the problem is with ULE, not with the change in question. -Maxim