From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 3 23:10:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498FA16A4CE; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 23:10:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5FE43D4C; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 23:10:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35])i63NATfs002412; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 19:10:30 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3264A53B94; Sat, 3 Jul 2004 16:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 16:10:27 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040703231027.GA74329@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200407020815.i628F5sp016504@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040702100347.GA9202@laptop.6bone.nl> <20040702161947.GI779@laptop.6bone.nl> <20040702215054.GA54100@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ACPI-CA 20040527 import X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 23:10:30 -0000 --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 10:17:54PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: > > It's a bit disingenuous to criticize someone for not building with -O2 > > and then noting in the next email that there's a known bug with -O2. >=20 > No, it isn't. The bug is there because we've been shoving that kind > of thing under the carpet for years, and the best way to stop doing > that is to make -O2 mandatory for developers. Then either make -O2 mandatory for developers by putting it in make.conf, or don't complain that developers aren't building with your private special settings. Kris --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA5zziWry0BWjoQKURAvnvAJ9gt9V3otZGLUARWydDb9YhHpU4XACdFvFO 6HEeh+f6R83K2hGuR6uEUyU= =UGFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--