From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 4 21:31:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from bankrupt.com (cc508428-b.trntn1.nj.home.com [24.9.94.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F15A37B401 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:31:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mars@cannoncreek.com) Received: (qmail 64912 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2001 04:23:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hellraiser.cannoncreek.com) (202.78.79.201) by cc508428-b.trntn1.nj.home.com with SMTP; 5 Jul 2001 04:23:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mars G Miro Reply-To: mars@cannoncreek.com To: "Anton Berezin" , "Peter Pentchev" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clarification on P5-CGI port Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:40:51 +0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Received: from the Dark Corners of Oblivion (172.16.1.254) X-Sender-Ip: 172.16.1.254 X-Copyright: 2001, Mars G. Miro, All Rights Reserved X-Notice: Redistribution and Duplication prohibited without proper consent of the Author MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01070512405100.03829@hellraiser.cannoncreek.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > > Will this be in time for FreeBSD 4.4R ? > > Let's see. The FreeBSD 4.4 release date is set to 2001-08-20. If > everything goes well, I'll be running 5.6.1 installed by make world on > my -current box this coming Sunday. Then there will be at least a week > before it hits -current: such a change requires a thorough review > process, and a lot of testing. So this gives us 2001-07-15 as the > optimistically set date for 5.6.1 in -current. This kind of change must > not be MFC'ed too quickly - there should be at least one month of > testing in -current. Then we are five days before the 4.4 release date > - and I will be shot if I put it in -stable this close to release. So > the answer is no. > sok, I think I(we) can wait > > > versions of PM files which are in the base system - currently, even > > > if such a port exists, and is installed, the older version of a > > > module will be used if care is not taken, since the perl system path > > > (/usr/libdata/perl/...) precedes perl local path > > > (/usr/local/lib/perl5/... in the default @INC array. This is going > > > to change. > > > So w/c means that at some point in the future, if I install a ported > > perl module, the perl path will look for it first, instead of the > > base, correct? > > That's correct. > okay > > > That said, the revival of the www/p5-CGI.pm port is in order, as > > > well as the renaming of www/p5-CGI to www/p5-CGI-modules. > > > That would be fascinating! As there might be a few of us here who want > > the functionality of the latest CGI.pm (for mod_perl, eperl, etc.) > > Yeah. I'll do the port tonight or tomorrow. > Great! this is fascinating. Thanks! > Cheers, > &Anton. > -- > May the tuna salad be with you. > cheers mars To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message