From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 26 05:50:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C3516A456; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DE743D45; Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3Q5oI13065901; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:50:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k3Q5oIs0065898; Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:50:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:50:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob X-X-Sender: mjacob@ns1.feral.com To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <444F0923.8050508@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20060425224750.K65869@ns1.feral.com> References: <444E7750.206@samsco.org> <200604251540.00170.jhb@freebsd.org> <444E7BFE.4040800@samsco.org> <20060425.173236.74726638.imp@bsdimp.com> <444EB6A1.3060901@samsco.org> <20060426103623.M1847@epsplex.bde.org> <20060425223519.F65802@ns1.feral.com> <444F0923.8050508@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, jhb@FreeBSD.org, Bruce Evans , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Matthew Jacob , Warner Losh Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/bce if_bcereg.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 05:50:23 -0000 >> >> I'm afraid I don't understand the 'unreasonable' argument here. Linux is >> eating your lunch today. Do you want it to eat your dessert as well? >> >> -matt >> > > bus_size_t is used for things like measuring transfer segment size. There is > little chance that Linux, Windows, FreeBSD, or any other OS > is ever going to try to DMA more than 2^32 bytes of data in a single > bus transaction. Maybe you could contrive a silly infiniband device > to do it. Anyways, it has no bearing on whether the CPU, memory > controller, or PCI buses can do 64 bit addressing. Oh, sorry, yes, I agree it's *unlikely* that anything will DMA more than 2^32 bytes at a time right now. I'm really really tired and lost lock. Sorry.